翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Hill Top, Menifee County, Kentucky ・ Hill Top, New South Wales ・ Hill Top, Stanley ・ Hill Top, Teesdale ・ Hill Top, West Virginia ・ Hill town ・ Hill Township ・ Hill Township, Kittson County, Minnesota ・ Hill Township, Knox County, Nebraska ・ Hill Township, Michigan ・ Hill Township, Pope County, Arkansas ・ Hill Tracts Presbyterian Church ・ Hill tribe (Thailand) ・ Hill v Baxter ・ Hill v CA Parsons & Co Ltd ・ Hill v Church of Scientology of Toronto ・ Hill v Tupper ・ Hill v. Colorado ・ Hill v. McDonough ・ Hill v. Wallace ・ Hill Valley ・ Hill Valley (Back to the Future) ・ Hill View Heights, Wyoming ・ Hill yield criterion ・ Hill Zaini ・ Hill's Absinth ・ Hill's Academy ・ Hill's Bar ・ Hill's horseshoe bat ・ Hill's muscle model Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Hill v Church of Scientology of Toronto ： ウィキペディア英語版 Hill v Church of Scientology of Toronto ''Hill v Church of Scientology of Toronto'' February 20, 1995- July 20, 1995. 2 S.C.R. 1130 was a libel case against the Church of Scientology, in which the Supreme Court of Canada interpreted Ontario's libel law in relation to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. After consideration, the Supreme Court of Canada determined that it would not follow the actual malice standard set forth in the famous United States Supreme Court case of ''New York Times Co. v. Sullivan'', 376 U.S. 254 (1964). ==Overview== On 17 September 1984 Morris Manning, a lawyer working for the Church, and representatives of the Church of Scientology held a press conference on the courthouse steps in Toronto. Manning, wearing his barrister's gown, read from and commented upon allegations in a notice of motion by Scientology, intending to commence criminal contempt proceedings against a Crown Attorney, Casey Hill. The motion alleged Hill had misled a judge and had breached orders sealing certain documents belonging to Scientology in ''R. v. Church of Scientology of Toronto''. At the contempt proceeding where the appellants were seeking a fine or imprisonment against the defendant, the allegations against Hill were found to be completely untrue and without foundation. Thus Hill launched a lawsuit for damages in libel against the appellants. Both appellants were found jointly liable for general damages of C$300,000 and Scientology alone was liable for aggravated damages of C$500,000 and punitive damages of C$800,000. The judgement was affirmed in a 1993 decision by the Court of Appeal for Ontario. The major issues raised in this appeal were: Was the common law of defamation valid in light of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and whether the jury's award of damages could stand. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Hill v Church of Scientology of Toronto」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.